RE: rfc 3280 interoperability testing

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>]

I think I'd recommend reading RFC 2438, and passing a pointer to the WG for 
reference.
Given how much angst we went through to get a "solution" to that issue, I 
think it's worthwhile to be able to cite "this worked previously, so we're 
not doing anything new" as much as possible.

There's still the occasional objection that 2438 is too hard to do; I have 
little patience with that, given how little it actually says you have to 
do....

--On 16. juli 2003 13:23 +0200 "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com> 
wrote:

> Sounds a bit aka how we do it for MIB objects.
> We do not require that the contents is tested (other than
> that it has the proper data-type, so proper format) or
> that apps approve that they can deal with the content.
>
> We documented our approach in RFC2438.