RE: CAPWAP BOF follow up: nmrg - CAPWAP

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

> >Anyway, I tried to motivate some of those people to come to IETF
> >and help create a WG (with active participants). But those people
> >did not come forward back then (some 2-3 years ago now)
> 
> The IEEE 802/IETF relationship history document talks a bit about the 
> history of IEEE 802 MIB development and the reasons that 
> joint work has been 
> declining:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-aboba-ieee802-rel-00.txt
> 
> As Dan notes, there is some value in better coordination between IEEE 802 
> and IETF on this -- IEEE 802 does not possess IETF's expertise in MIB 
> design, and could probably benefit from review by "MIB 
> doctors".  Whether we want to take that on is another issue.
> 
I have been telling to who-ever wants to hear it) that we MIB doctors
are willing to review IEEE 802.x related MIB documents.
I believe that we get exposed to a lot of that technology, and if they
do MIB development, we better help them do a good job at that.

my 2 cents

Bert