RE: The "purpose of the IETF" thing

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

> I think the "high quality, relevant standards for the Internet"
> is a fine capsule description of *one* thing we do.

I think that the IESG at the London IETF (but we have a few new
members now) was more or less in agreement with that *one* thing
we do or at least need to do. 

Form the discussions on the problem-statement and the latest 
IESG plenary, I am not so sure that we have IETF-wide consensus
on that. Do we?

Bert