IESG: The RFC Editor has received a request for an RFC number from Kuntal Chowdhury for <draft-ietf-ipv6-unicast-aggr-v2-03.txt>. (See message below.) Does the IESG want to request expedited publication of this document? Thanks, Joyce ------------- Begin Forwarded Message ------------- From: "Kuntal Chowdhury" <chowdury@nortelnetworks.com> To: "'rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org'" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Subject: RFC number for draft-ietf-ipv6-unicast-aggr-v2-03.txt Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 09:29:09 -0500 Hello, Would you kindly assign an RFC number for "draft-ietf-ipv6-unicast-aggr-v2-03.txt" as soon as possible. There is a normative reference in a TIA standard (TIA-835-C) to RFC 2374 that this draft obsoletes (makes it historic). The TIA-835-C is ready for publication at this time. However, it still references RFC2374 since there is no alternative RFC number for IPv6 addressing architecture. It would be nice to have the RFC2374 reference replaced with the new RFC number before publication of this TIA standard. Thanks for your help in this matter and best regards, -Kuntal ------------- End Forwarded Message -------------Title: RFC number for draft-ietf-ipv6-unicast-aggr-v2-03.txt
Hello,
Would you kindly assign an RFC number for "draft-ietf-ipv6-unicast-aggr-v2-03.txt" as soon as possible. There is a normative reference in a TIA standard (TIA-835-C) to RFC 2374 that this draft obsoletes (makes it historic). The TIA-835-C is ready for publication at this time. However, it still references RFC2374 since there is no alternative RFC number for IPv6 addressing architecture. It would be nice to have the RFC2374 reference replaced with the new RFC number before publication of this TIA standard.
Thanks for your help in this matter and best regards,
-Kuntal