[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
WG-recharter and moving to OPS area
Thomas reminded me that we agreed yesterday to replace
the MIB advisor on that WG (the old one was not
active anynmore and agreed to step down, Mike agreed
to pick up this responsibility).
Pls make sure to also include text about the move to OPS area.
So the text to be announced is as follows:
The ATOMMIB WG has been doing only MIB work, and so as part of
the re-chartering process it is being moved from the INT area
to the OPS area.
- ---- New ATOMMIB WG charter -----
Status: approved by IESG
Chair(s):
Faye Ly <faye@pedestalnetworks.com>
Kam Lam <hklam@lucent.com>
Operations and Management Area Director(s):
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Bert Wijnen <bwijnen@lucent.com>
Operations and Management Area Advisor:
Bert Wijnen <bwijnen@lucent.com>
Technical Advisor(s):
Mike Heard, <heard@pobox.com>
Mailing Lists:
General Discussion: atommib@research.telcordia.com
To Subscribe: atommib-request@research.telcordia.com
Archive: ftp://ftp.research.telcordia.com/pub/Group.archive/atommib
Description of Working Group:
The AToM MIB Working Group is currently chartered to:
1. Maintain and advance on the standards track the existing
specifications for ATM management (RFC2512-2515).
2. Maintain and advance on the standards track other trunk-mib
specifications (i.e., for DS0 - DS3-E3, RFC2493-2496).
The objects defined by the working group will be consistent with the
Internet-standard Management framework.
Goals and Milestones:
Done Revised OpticalMIB Internet-Draft and make available for
discussion
Done Submit the SONET APS MIB to the IESG for consideration as
a Proposed Standard
Done Report on implementation experience on RFC 2558
Done Submit OpticalMIB Internet-Draft to IESG for standards
track elevation
Done Submit the ATM Supplemental to the IESG for consideration
as a Proposed Standard
Done Report on implementation experience on RFC 2493
Done Submit any needed revisions of RFC2493 to the IESG for
standards track advancement as appropriate
Done Submit any needed revisions of RFC2558 to the IESG for
standards track advancement as appropriate
Oct 03 Report on implementation experience on RFC 2494
Oct 03 Report on implementation experience on RFC 2495-2496
Oct 03 Report on implementation experience on RFC 2512-2513
Oct 03 Report on implementation experience on RFC 2514-2515
Oct 03 Submit any needed revisions of RFC2495-2496 to the IESG
for standards track advancement as appropriate
Oct 03 Submit any needed revisions of RFC2514-2515 to the IESG
for consideration of standards track advancement as
appropriate
Jan 04 Submit any needed revisions of RFC2494 to the IESG for
standards track advancement as appropriate
Jan 04 Submit any needed revisions of RFC2512-2513 to the IESG
for consideration of standards track advancement
as appropriate
Jan 04 Re-evaluate charter or close the WG