RE: FW: AD response to Site-Local Appeal

["Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>]

I support what Brian stated and the ADs please lets move on here.
/jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brc@zurich.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 10:21 AM
> To: ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com
> Cc: iesg@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: FW: AD response to Site-Local Appeal
> 
> 
> Scott Bradner wrote:
> > 
> > fwiw - I fully agree with kre
> > (that has happened before in case anyone wondered)
> 
> fwiw, I don't (and I have both agreed and disagreed with kre 
> and sob in the past).
> 
> I really think this is a distraction. Objectively, the WG is 
> getting on with the three things that need to be done 
> (requirements, an alternative proposal, and a draft 
> deprecation document). To me there was manifestly rough 
> consensus for this course of action: what else could 
> "deprecate site local" mean to anyone who had been reading 
> the mailing list for the previous several months? The details 
> naturally depend on those three documents, which will have to 
> be taken through due process. There was certainly not 
> unanimity, or a detailed proposal, when choosing this course of 
> action, but that's no ground for overruling the chairs.
> 
>    Brian
> 
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> - - Brian E Carpenter 
> Distinguished Engineer, Internet Standards & Technology, IBM 
> 
> NEW ADDRESS <brc@zurich.ibm.com> PLEASE UPDATE ADDRESS BOOK
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to majordomo@sunroof.eng.sun.com
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>