RE: AD response to Site-Local Appeal

["Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>]

Unfortuneately Michel is 100% correct.  This is an issue already I see
in real deployment analysis.

/jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michel Py [mailto:michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us] 
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 10:42 AM
> To: Brian E Carpenter; ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com
> Cc: iesg@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: AD response to Site-Local Appeal
> 
> 
> Brian,
> 
> > Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > Personally, I'd advise customers who believe they need 
> local addresses 
> > to continue using FEC0 until the addressing architecture is revised 
> > and products catch up.
> 
> Customers don't like incertitude when designing networks and 
> will delay IPv6 deployment until this is settled.
> 
> Michel.
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to majordomo@sunroof.eng.sun.com
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>