[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Tod Glassey Appeal

Harald has asked me to take the lead on dealing with this
one. I think the first thing to do is to publish it on
the http://www.ietf.org/IESG/Appeals.html web page.

I think that posting the complete email (as per below) there
is the thing to do. Anyone sees any issues with that?

Second step then probably is that I write Todd that I will
be "shepherding" his appeal in/through the IESG and inform
him that I will respond when we are done.

I am threading carefully here, cause this is my first time
to handle an appeal to IESG... and cause this guy is already
threatening to involve lawyers.

Funny that he informas us that Jorge is one of his attorneys.
Would Jorge not be in a "conflict of interest" situation here?

Thanks,
Bert 

-----Original Message-----
From: todd glassey [mailto:todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net]
Sent: woensdag 6 augustus 2003 4:14
To: iesg@ietf.org; chair@ietf.org; problem-statement@alvestrand.no
Cc: degarmo5@earthlink.net; Contreras, Jorge
Subject: Official notice of appeal on suspension rights.


Be advised that this is an official submission of an appeal on the
suspension of my posting rights as per Harald Alverstrand, Chair of the
IETF. I want to get this matter expedited so we can either reconcile this or
take it into an open court.

Harald's commentary regarding my posting is ridiculous.


    With regard to my posting 20% of the list's traffic, the 2418 clause
that calls this a Denial of Service Attack is in fact a smoke screen to
allow the IETF to set limits on how many postings any one person can make,
but only in arbitrary matters, clearly causing a tortuous interference with
my participation since issues are being resolved that I cannot participate
in.  And unless the IESG or the IETF is going to formally place a specific
limit on the number of responses that one can submit to postings, then this
matter is clearly an act of prejudicial harassment of the IETF Chair and the
WG Chairs to suppress that the IPR group is essentially not in my opinion
fixing problems but rather making the process and the disclosure issues more
painful.


Further, the Chair commented that I had "Threatened legal action" against
several list members, and I would like to see specific evidence to this
"fact" as it was used, since I clearly deny that this is true. Please
produce the specific commentary and explain how it was threatening. What I
have asked several officers of the IETF and the IESG is whether there is
financial coverage for them in operating the organization as any good entity
would have. They have refused to answer this in any way. I have also voiced
an opinion that the IETF's policies are bringing it head-on into areas where
legal action will not be avoidable but I have not said specifically that I
would sue anyone. I don't make silly threats, I act upon the causative
actions in appropriate manners only.

Finally the commentary that "I have been warned" repeatedly by the WG Chairs
to not post off topic mailings is ridiculous and contrary to the IETF's
charter and operating process, and it must formally take notice of this or
face the problems that this refusal to accept the obvious brings. By their
very nature, the IETF WG' Lists MUST accept all postings or it is impossible
to disclose new ideas on the list, making the process of submitting an I-D
***the only way that new ideas can be submitted*** or can be vetted and for
WG Chairs to suppress is contrary to the IETF's operational models (no
matter how hokey they are) as defined in RFC2026, RFC2223, and RFC2418.

Please be advised, that I will continue to escalate this matter until
resolution is forthcoming, and yes Jorge, the other person on the cc line is
one of my attorneys.

Todd Glassey