Re: Tod Glassey Appeal

["Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>]

In message <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B1550236189F@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.c
om>, "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" writes:
>> >
>> >Funny that he informas us that Jorge is one of his attorneys.
>> >Would Jorge not be in a "conflict of interest" situation here?
>> >
>> He isn't saying that -- he's telling Jorge that one of the other 
>> addressees is his lawyer.
>> 
>Mmm... aha....
>So the "and yes Jorge," means he now addresses Jorge for the 
>remainder of the sentence. Oh well...

I'm not going to defend the quirks of the English language...
>
>> >
>> >Please be advised, that I will continue to escalate this matter until
>> >resolution is forthcoming, and yes Jorge, the other person 
>> >on the cc line is one of my attorneys.
>> >
>> 
>> You should probably get a new mailing list set up for the appeal, since 
>> Harald, Rob, and I need to recuse ourselves.
>> 
>Mmm... is that really so? 
>Have we done that in the past when an apeal came to the IESG?
>Or is it sufficient that the 3 of you just do NOT participate in
>the discussion on the list?

We've certainly had people drop off the call when appeals are 
discussed.  But the three of us need to be able to send email to the 
list, so we can tell our side of the story.
>
>Anyway, I am sure that Randy can set up a new list if needed.

I could, too, but that wouldn't be appropriate...


		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb