Re: Test message to the IESG list

[Stanley Weilnau <sweilnau@cnri.reston.va.us>]

Yes, optimus is is cleaning itself up also.  Due to the issue on ietf-mx, 
optimus recieved a large amount of mail to process in a very short time.  
The inbound queue on optimus was up over 8000 messages on Monday.

Stanley Weilnau


On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Bill Fenner wrote:

> 
> BTW, the email to IESG list admins is delayed even worse.
> Here's a sample message that I just received, asking to approve
> a message from Sunday:
> 
> message <20030831151901.9738.15834.Mailman@www1.ietf.org>
> 1d 22h 41m 14s end to end
>           0s MUA -> optimus.ietf.org
>       2m 22s optimus.ietf.org -> ietf-mx
> 1d 13h 35m 22s ietf-mx -> ietf-mx
>          -3s ietf-mx -> ietf.org
>           8s ietf.org -> optimus.ietf.org
>   2h 26m 21s optimus.ietf.org -> optimus.ietf.org
>   5h 42m 53s optimus.ietf.org -> mail-red.research.att.com
>      55m 11s mail-red.research.att.com -> janus
>      -3m 58s janus -> mail-green.research.att.com
>           0s mail-green.research.att.com -> mail-green.research.att.com
>           0s mail-green.research.att.com -> mail-green.research.att.com
>       2m 58s mail-green.research.att.com -> unixmail.research.att.com
> 
> This one spent over a day and a half on ietf-mx, then around 8 more
> hours on optimus.  (Only 2.5 hours in the optimus->optimus step,
> which I assume is the mailing list expansion, but then another 6
> hours trying to deliver it.  I haven't experienced similar delays
> in incoming mail from other sources, so I assume that this delay
> is also on optimus's side.)
> 
>   Bill
>