Re: Test message to the IESG list

[Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>]

>This is a message because there have been observations about problems with
>the IESG list.

This message took 15 hours to arrive.  It spent 4 hours at ietf-mx
and 11.5 at optimus.

>message <Pine.GSO.4.31.0309011812350.26281-100000@mailbox.cnri.reston.va.us>
> 15h 19m 14s end to end
>          1s MUA -> ns.cnri.reston.va.us
>          0s ns.cnri.reston.va.us -> ietf-mx
>  3h 56m 39s ietf-mx -> ietf-mx
>         -3s ietf-mx -> ietf.org
>          7s ietf.org -> optimus.ietf.org
> 11h 23m 25s optimus.ietf.org -> optimus.ietf.org
>    -51m 58s optimus.ietf.org -> mail-red.research.att.com
>     51m 59s mail-red.research.att.com -> janus
>     -3m 59s janus -> mail-green.research.att.com
>          2s mail-green.research.att.com -> mail-green.research.att.com
>          1s mail-green.research.att.com -> mail-green.research.att.com
>          3m mail-green.research.att.com -> unixmail.research.att.com

(Is Stanley on the list of people who is allowed to post without
approval or was some of the delay because the message had to get
approved?  In any case, Harald's test message also spent quite a
long time on optimus, and he is allowed to post without approval.)

  Bill