RE: ipv6 doc addresses, please add to id-nits

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>]

[catching up on old mail]

--On 10. august 2003 12:25 +0200 "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com> 
wrote:

> I still have the "todo" item to split the NITS into
> - those mechanical nits that RFC-Editor can (and is willing to)
>   fix when the doc gets into their queue
> - those that we find serious enough that we (ADs) want to be
>   fixed before we even put the doc on IESG agenda.
>
> I will include this item in my todo-list for that ID-NITS
> work. Does rest of IESG agree that I include this?

I certainly think this is a good idea.
Unless I hear objections, I suggest that you just do it.

                 Harald
> Thanks,
> Bert
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rob Austein [mailto:sra@hactrn.net]
> > Sent: zondag 10 augustus 2003 7:03
> > To: iesg@ietf.org
> > Subject: ipv6 doc addresses, please add to id-nits
> >
> >
> > ID-nits lists the IPv4 documentation address range (192.0.2.0/24) but
> > doesn't list the equivalent IPv6 range.  If it lists one, it should
> > list the other.  (Thanks to Bill Manning for the pointer.)
> >
> > Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 14:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: bmanning@karoshi.com
> >
> > APNIC made the following delegation in late 2002:
> >
> > the IPv6 prefix 2001:0DB8::/32 has been set aside for use in
> > documentation.
> >
> > ref:
> >
> > http://www.apnic.net/info/faq/ipv6-documentation-prefix-faq.html