[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: ipv6 doc addresses, please add to id-nits



Will do, and thanks for the gentle reminder of this to-do
item.

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand [mailto:harald@alvestrand.no]
> Sent: vrijdag 5 september 2003 17:04
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Rob Austein; iesg@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: ipv6 doc addresses, please add to id-nits
> 
> 
> [catching up on old mail]
> 
> --On 10. august 2003 12:25 +0200 "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" 
> <bwijnen@lucent.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> > I still have the "todo" item to split the NITS into
> > - those mechanical nits that RFC-Editor can (and is willing to)
> >   fix when the doc gets into their queue
> > - those that we find serious enough that we (ADs) want to be
> >   fixed before we even put the doc on IESG agenda.
> >
> > I will include this item in my todo-list for that ID-NITS
> > work. Does rest of IESG agree that I include this?
> 
> I certainly think this is a good idea.
> Unless I hear objections, I suggest that you just do it.
> 
>                   Harald
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bert
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Rob Austein [mailto:sra@hactrn.net]
> >> Sent: zondag 10 augustus 2003 7:03
> >> To: iesg@ietf.org
> >> Subject: ipv6 doc addresses, please add to id-nits
> >>
> >>
> >> ID-nits lists the IPv4 documentation address range 
> (192.0.2.0/24) but
> >> doesn't list the equivalent IPv6 range.  If it lists one, it should
> >> list the other.  (Thanks to Bill Manning for the pointer.)
> >>
> >> Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 14:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
> >> From: bmanning@karoshi.com
> >>
> >> APNIC made the following delegation in late 2002:
> >>
> >> the IPv6 prefix 2001:0DB8::/32 has been set aside for use in
> >> documentation.
> >>
> >> ref:
> >>
> >> http://www.apnic.net/info/faq/ipv6-documentation-prefix-faq.html
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
>