Re: The RFC2418 Appellet processes

["Ole J. Jacobsen" <ole@cisco.com>]

Todd,

Has it at all occured to you that your definition of "fair and open" might
not be universally shared?

Is it just possible that because someone disagrees with you they may in
fact not be wrong?

No, I didn't think so.

Ole



Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
Tel: +1 408-527-8972   GSM: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: ole@cisco.com  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj



On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, todd glassey wrote:

> Pekka - you might take heed of your own signing of this posting, because the
> blood is knee deep in this kingdom, and it's partially your fault. Yours and
> everyone that refuses to place being Fair and Open above any personal or
> commercial interests here in this "so called" standards organization.
>
> So yes the Kingdom bleeds while the IETF's "do nothing's" try and block
> people from making them personally accountable for their acts herein...
>
> Todd Glassey
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pekka Savola" <pekkas@netcore.fi>
> To: "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <harald@Alvestrand.no>
> Cc: "todd glassey" <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net>;
> <poised@lists.tislabs.com>; <iesg@ietf.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 11:16 PM
> Subject: Re: The RFC2418 Appellate processes
>
>
> > On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> > [...]
> > > While this may seem partisan, I see no necessary relationship between
> > > "justice" and "Todd Glassey gets his way".
> >
> > Extremely well put.  Todd and others should note the word "necessary".
> >
> > --
> > Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
> > Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
> > Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
> >
> >
>