Re: The RFC2418 Appellant processes

[John Leslie <john@jlc.net>]

Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@Alvestrand.no> wrote:
> Todd Glassey wrote:
> 
>> 2) A formal appeal process MUST be put in place to allow the
>> appellate to introduce evidence on their behalf for consideration
>> otherwise there is no mechanism to enter material into the record
>> of the appeal.
> 
> The appeal text filed by the appealant is publicly filed.
> See <http://www.ietf.org/IESG/APPEALS/todd-glassey-appeal.txt>.
> The mailing list archives, which were the basis of the original
> decision, are public.
> What more evidence do you need to introduce?

   A most fair response.

   I hestitate to add anything, but after sleeping on it, I think
a tiny addition is called for.

   Mr Glassey, as appellant, bears the sole responsibility for:

1) Clearly stating what action he is appealing; and

2) Clearly stating what relief he seeks.

   IMHO, he has failed on both counts.

--
John Leslie <john@jlc.net>