Evaluation: draft-ietf-pkix-logotypes - Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure: Logotypes in X.509 certificates

[IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>]

--------

Last Call to expire on: 2003-06-19

        Please return the full line with your position.

                      Yes  No-Objection  Discuss  Abstain
Harald Alvestrand    [   ]     [   ]     [   ]     [   ]
Steve Bellovin       [ X ]     [   ]     [   ]     [   ]
Randy Bush           [   ]     [   ]     [   ]     [   ]
Bill Fenner          [   ]     [   ]     [   ]     [   ]
Ned Freed            [   ]     [   ]     [   ]     [   ]
Ted Hardie           [   ]     [   ]     [   ]     [   ]
Russ Housley         [   ]     [   ]     [   ]     [   ]
Allison Mankin       [   ]     [   ]     [   ]     [   ]
Thomas Narten        [   ]     [   ]     [   ]     [   ]
Jon Peterson         [   ]     [   ]     [   ]     [   ]
Margaret Wasserman   [   ]     [   ]     [   ]     [   ]
Bert Wijnen          [   ]     [   ]     [   ]     [   ]
Alex Zinin           [   ]     [   ]     [   ]     [   ]

2/3 (9) Yes or No-Objection opinions needed to pass.

DISCUSSES AND COMMENTS:
======================



^L 
---- following is a DRAFT of message to be sent AFTER approval ---
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce:;
Cc: Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>,
    RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, <ietf-pkix@imc.org>
Subject: Protocol Action: 'Internet X.509 Public Key 
         Infrastructure: Logotypes in X.509 certificates' to Proposed 
         Standard 

The IESG has approved following document:

- 'Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure: Logotypes in X.509 certificates'
   <draft-ietf-pkix-logotypes-11.txt> as a Proposed Standard

This document is the product of the Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509) Working Group. 

The IESG contact persons are Steve Bellovin and Russ Housley.

Technical Summary

This document provides for a way to embed visual or audible logos within X.509 certificates.

Working Group Summary

There was initially some controversy about whether or not these extensions were reasonable.  Eventually, the working group agreed that they were a good ida.

Protocol Quality,

This specification has been reviewed for the IESG by Steve Bellovin.