[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: evaluation: draft-siemborski-mupdate

To: Steve Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>
Subject: Re: evaluation: draft-siemborski-mupdate
From: ned.freed@mrochek.com
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 00:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: iesg@ietf.org
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Wed, 17 Sep 2003 21:14:14 -0400" <20030918011414.929297C92@berkshire.research.att.com>
References: <20030918011414.929297C92@berkshire.research.att.com>

>         8.4 -- the text speaks of "BAD" instead of "BYE"
 
>         8.6 speaks of "reserved" -- is that a dreg from 8.5?


Yep, looks like two typos to me. I'll put them both in an RFC Editor
note.

				Ned

References:
- evaluation: draft-siemborski-mupdate
  - From: Steve Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>

Prev by Date: incoming fire from GGF.....
Next by Date: RE: Discuss on draft-ietf-iptel-trip-mib-08.txt
Previous by thread: evaluation: draft-siemborski-mupdate
Next by thread: evaluation: draft-baker-soap-media-reg
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread