[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-mrose-ietf-posting-03



I can forward this to the author, and suggest that we can do this with an RFC Editor note. That OK with y'all?

--On 18. september 2003 19:30 -0400 Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:

Here is my suggested rewording to avoid the term "vote."

The 2nd paragraph of section 2...

OLD:

    As a part of its activities, the Internet Engineering Steering Group
    (IESG) votes on "actions". Typically, an action refers to the
    publication of a document on the standards-track, the chartering of a
    working group, and so on. This memo recommends that the IESG also
    undertake a new type of action, termed a PR-action.

NEW:

    As a part of its activities, the Internet Engineering Steering Group
    (IESG) makes decisions about "actions". Typically, an action
    refers to the publication of a document on the standards-track, the
    chartering of a working group, and so on. This memo recommends
    that the IESG also undertake a new type of action, termed a
    PR-action.

The numbered list in section 2...

OLD:

    1.  it is introduced by an IESG Area Director (AD), who, prior to
        doing so, may choose to inform the interested parties;

    2.  is is published as an IESG last call on the IETF general
        discussion list;

3. it is discussed by the community;

4. it is discussed by the IESG; and, finally,

5. it is voted upon by the IESG.

NEW:

    1.  it is introduced by an IESG Area Director (AD), who, prior to
        doing so, may choose to inform the interested parties;

    2.  it is published as an IESG last call on the IETF general
        discussion list;

3. it is discussed by the community;

4. it is discussed by the IESG; and, finally,

    5.  using the usual consensus-based process, it is decided
        upon by the IESG.