[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Evaluation: draft-ietf-nomcom-rfc2727bis - IAB and IESG Selection, Confirmation, and Recall Process: Operation of the Nominating and Recall Committees
- To: Internet Engineering Steering Group <iesg@ietf.org>
- Subject: Evaluation: draft-ietf-nomcom-rfc2727bis - IAB and IESG Selection, Confirmation, and Recall Process: Operation of the Nominating and Recall Committees
- From: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
- Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 13:07:52 -0400
--------
Last Call to expire on: 2003-09-12
Please return the full line with your position.
Yes No-Objection Discuss Abstain
Harald Alvestrand [ X ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Steve Bellovin [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Randy Bush [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Bill Fenner [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Ned Freed [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Ted Hardie [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Russ Housley [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Allison Mankin [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Thomas Narten [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Jon Peterson [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Margaret Wasserman [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Bert Wijnen [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Alex Zinin [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
2/3 (9) Yes or No-Objection opinions needed to pass.
DISCUSSES AND COMMENTS:
======================
^L
---- following is a DRAFT of message to be sent AFTER approval ---
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce:;
Cc: Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>,
RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, <ietf-nomcom@lists.elistx.com>
Subject: Protocol Action: 'IAB and IESG Selection, Confirmation,
and Recall Process: Operation of the Nominating and Recall
Committees' to BCP
The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft 'IAB and IESG Selection,
Confirmation, and Recall Process: Operation of the Nominating and Recall
Committees' <draft-ietf-nomcom-rfc2727bis-07.txt> as a BCP. This document
is the product of the Operation of the IESG/IAB Nominating and Recall
Committees Working Group.
The IESG contact person is Harald Alvestrand.
Technical Summary
This document describes the operation of the IETF NomCom.
This version updates the rules by which the Nomcom process is governed.
In many cases, ambiguities that had been found in 2727 were resolved.
In other cases, situations that had been left to the discretion of the
participants were codified.
Working Group Summary
On a lot of issues, there was smooth consensus in the working group.
On some issues, there was significant controversy, but rough consensus.
In one case (publication of names of nominees) consensus was not reached,
and the text remained unchanged from 2727.
Protocol Quality
The document has been reviewed for the IESG by Harald Alvestrand.