in case you did not get any other response (this may be fumbled between the RFC Editor and the shepherding AD):
submit a revised I-D with acceptable boilerplate for publication to internet-drafts@ietf.org.
--On 15. september 2003 10:28 -0700 Frank Quick <fquick@qualcomm.com> wrote:
I didn't receive any response to this mail; resending.
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 09:07:16 -0700 To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> From: Frank Quick <fquick@qualcomm.com> Subject: Re: Informational RFC to be: draft-carroll-dynmobileip-cdma-00.txt Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Christoper.Carroll@verizonwireless.com
It seems progress is being made from our end: both sides agree that we can accept the language of RFC 2026 section 10. How should we proceed in order to submit a revised version and move it forward to RFC status?
Frank Quick office +1-858-658-3608 fax +1-858-651-1940 portable +1-619-890-5749 paging fquick@pager.qualcomm.com RSA: 29EA D619 31F2 B4D3 8815 3D59 4340 FA43 D-H: 2A24 131C D38F 12E6 4D6A 46EE 8BBF B50A 754E F63D
Frank Quick office +1-858-658-3608 fax +1-858-651-1940 portable +1-619-890-5749 paging fquick@pager.qualcomm.com RSA: 29EA D619 31F2 B4D3 8815 3D59 4340 FA43 D-H: 2A24 131C D38F 12E6 4D6A 46EE 8BBF B50A 754E F63D