[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fwd: Re: Informational RFC to be: draft-carroll-dynmobileip-cdma-00.txt



in case you did not get any other response (this may be fumbled between the RFC Editor and the shepherding AD):

submit a revised I-D with acceptable boilerplate for publication to internet-drafts@ietf.org.

--On 15. september 2003 10:28 -0700 Frank Quick <fquick@qualcomm.com> wrote:

I didn't receive any response to this mail; resending.

Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 09:07:16 -0700
To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
From: Frank Quick <fquick@qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: Informational RFC to be:
draft-carroll-dynmobileip-cdma-00.txt Cc: RFC Editor
<rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>,
Christoper.Carroll@verizonwireless.com

It seems progress is being made from our end:  both sides agree that we
can accept the language of RFC 2026 section 10.  How should we proceed
in  order to submit a revised version and move it forward to RFC status?


Frank Quick
office   +1-858-658-3608 fax +1-858-651-1940
portable +1-619-890-5749
paging   fquick@pager.qualcomm.com
RSA: 29EA D619 31F2 B4D3  8815 3D59 4340 FA43
D-H: 2A24 131C D38F 12E6 4D6A  46EE 8BBF B50A 754E F63D