RE: Discussion venues for the community

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

Fine by me.

Howebver, I see no action on my mention of London "mission/goals"
statement. I did see that Randy mentioned it as well.

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand [mailto:harald@alvestrand.no]
> Sent: woensdag 24 september 2003 21:28
> To: iesg@ietf.org
> Subject: Discussion venues for the community
> 
> 
> After cogitation, I've added the following to the statement 
> of "current 
> work", at the bottom of the document:
> 
> Present discussion venues
> --------------------------
> At the moment the discussion on these matters is carried out 
> in multiple 
> places.
> 
> * The problem-statement working group is tasked to bring 
> forth a proposal 
> for the process to address the problems. Mailing list is 
> problem-statement@alvestrand.no.
> * The solutions@alvestrand.no mailing list is being used to 
> have initial, 
> open-ended discussions of ideas that might provide parts of 
> the final set 
> of changes to the IETF structure and work methods.
> 
> Both lists are monitored by the IESG members. Mail may also 
> be sent to the 
> IESG directly.
> 
> -----------------------------------------------
> I think that's the status quo. Makes sense to say that?
> 
>                         Harald
> 
>