Re: References to work in progress

[Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>]

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> writes:

> nope.  my issue is simply that if you have a reference, please make
> it complete and unambiguous.  it allows someone to actually
> de-reference it, which i suspect is the reason for references.  if
> you don't want someone to follow the reference, then don't make it.

I am sypathetic to this argument. I'm not at all sure that it makes
sense to have references to "works in progress".

Thomas