Re: References to work in progress

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

mornin' bob,

> Your positions seem to be more absolutist than necessary.  A WIP
> reference actually CAN be useful, and it is hopefully not that
> hard to track down the actual I-D.

in fact, that is our (at least smb's and my, and likely others')
fear.  given "WIP" or just the title, one can not be sure which
version of the draft is the right one.

> the RFC Editor certainly would be happy to avoid WIP references
> whenever possible!

as would we all, i think.

randy