Re: Informational RFC to be: draft-irtf-nsrg-report-10.txt

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

> forestalling the iesg-secretary query....
> I think this is best reviewed for conflicts in the Internet area.
> Second best might be Routing.

i don't have the stomach for reading this now, and i received an
extra writing assignment this noon.  but my memory, as a member
of the nsrg, is that this was supposed to be a report of some
meetings and discussions of an irtf research group.  i.e., it is
kind of like minutes, and not ours to say what they had a right
to think or not.

note that this may be a case of my playing voltaire [0]: "I
disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your
right to say it."

randy

--

[0] - note that this is attributed to Voltaire, but is actually
      believed to be derived from his work and pseudo-quoted by
      tallentyre.  how is that for a pedantry for the day?