[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Informational RFC to be: draft-irtf-nsrg-report-10.txt



I think, like you, that it would take something *really* strange to make it appropriate for the IESG to object to this document.

So I hope the review is a formality....

--On 29. september 2003 17:15 -0700 Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

forestalling the iesg-secretary query....
I think this is best reviewed for conflicts in the Internet area.
Second best might be Routing.

i don't have the stomach for reading this now, and i received an extra writing assignment this noon. but my memory, as a member of the nsrg, is that this was supposed to be a report of some meetings and discussions of an irtf research group. i.e., it is kind of like minutes, and not ours to say what they had a right to think or not.

note that this may be a case of my playing voltaire [0]: "I
disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your
right to say it."

randy

--

[0] - note that this is attributed to Voltaire, but is actually
      believed to be derived from his work and pseudo-quoted by
      tallentyre.  how is that for a pedantry for the day?