RE: draft-ietf-rmonmib-apm-mib

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

Russ writes:

> My DISCUSS comment, which is also in the Data Tracker:
> 
> The document includes example server names.  The server names 
> chosen imply something about the kind of service being offered,
> but then do not have the typical "example.com" structure.

Well, they do NOT use something aka: amazon.com
Cause I kind of bet that I would have found it with my (implicit)
focus on ID-NITS. ALthough I see that there is one coccurance
that I missed, namely hr.corp.com

Instead they use what you all "company names". 
We may wonder if these is indeed true (to the letter, yes, but
in spirit ?? I wonder). I think they want to show end-user
understandable situations here. ANd it seem what they are
using makes a lot of sense to try and explain the
different services. more below

> I think that company names can be avoided 
> without loosing the message.  For example:
> 
>       Amazon   --> www.example.com
>       SAP      --> acct.example.com
>       HR       --> hr.example.com
>       ietf     --> ftp.example.com
>       CNN      --> live-action.news.example.com
>       Pop3     --> pop3.mail.example.com
>       CallCtr  --> call-center.example.com
> 
I really wonder if this is as clear.
But I will check with the WG.

Bert
> Russ
> 
>