Re: Plenary Scheduling

["James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>]

Looks OK, except I suspect folks will want more open mic time. It tends to
be quite popular.

            jak

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Geoff Huston" <gih@telstra.net>
To: "Leslie Daigle" <leslie@thinkingcat.com>
Cc: <iab@ietf.org>; "iesg" <iesg@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 5:29 PM
Subject: Re: Plenary Scheduling


> Rough Proposal - IETF Plenary Sessions
>
>
>
>
> Wednesday PM - Plenary Presentations
>
>   - Introduction - Harald
>
>
>     aim for 2 x 40 minute presentation slots with time for 30 minute
comments.
>     The presentations could be either a single presentation or a number of
>     presentations on a single theme
>
>
>     My guess is that we'd be aiming for presnetations that tie in some
>     aspects of current deployment with research activity, but they could
also
>     be informative, or kite flying.
>
>     I have no particular suggestions at present, although I'm sure others
>     have picked up some interesting aspects of plenary presentations at
other
>     conferences in recent times. (like, how DO you support a game server
>     with 100,000 registered game players like this new Star Wars thingy -
whats
>     the internal server deisgn, protocol architecture, etc)
>
>
>
> Thursday PM - Joint IESG / IAB Open Meeting
>
>
>    - Introduction  to the format and Agenda (Harald) - 5 minutes
>
>    - Current Status overviews  - 1 Hour
>
>          - IETF Chair       15 Minutes
>             (include meeting statistics)
>
>          - IAB Chair        10 Minutes
>
>          - IRTF Chair       10 Minutes
>
>          - IETF Secretariat 10 Minutes
>
>          - RFC Editor       10 Minutes
>
>          - IANA             10 Minutes
>
>          Optional slots open for ISOC and ICANN
>
>          Suggested format - 3 - 4 slides of highlights and a pointer
>          further information as necessary / appropriate
>
>
>    - Other items of IESG and IAB business - 1 Hour
>
>      (possible items for the November meeting, to be conducted with
>       opportunity for open comment)
>
>      - Report from IAB Advisory Committee
>
>      - Report on ICANN response to DNS wildcard issues
>
>      - IETF Finances
>
>      - Current IESG issues?
>
>           In the past we've had Harald's finance presentation, the problem
>           presentation, etc. I.e. items of IESG and / or IAB business that
>           are considered to be appropriate to present to the IETF in
plenary
>           as part of this joint open meeting.
>
>    - Opportunity for plenary comment (open mic) - notionally up to 1 Hour
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >At 01:56 PM 2/10/2003 -0400, Leslie Daigle wrote:
> >
> >>Geoff,
> >>
> >>Can you put together a straw proposal for the agendas for the 2
plenaries?
> >>
> >>Otherwise, it seems difficult to adequately discuss the "then can't we
just
> >>have one plenary and take another evening for (real) meetings?" issue.
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>Leslie.
> >>
> >>Geoff Huston wrote:
> >>>With the draft agenda just out its probably worth asking the question:
> >>>   Is there sufficient support and momentum to run with a revised
> >>>   plenary structure as per our discussions on the topic some weeks
> >>>   back?
> >>>thanks,
> >>>
> >>>   Geoff
> >>>WEDNESDAY, November 12, 2003
> >>>1930-2200 IESG Open Plenary
> >>>THURSDAY, November 13, 2003
> >>>1930-2200 Open IAB Plenary
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>
> >>-------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>"Reality:
> >>      Yours to discover."
> >>                                 -- ThinkingCat
> >>Leslie Daigle
> >>leslie@thinkingcat.com
> >>-------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>