[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [ipfix] Congestion management
- To: iesg <iesg@ietf.org>
- Subject: RE: [ipfix] Congestion management
- From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 00:50:17 +0200
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "Carter Bullard" <carter@qosient.com>
Cc: <ipfix@net.doit.wisc.edu>
Subject: RE: [ipfix] Congestion management
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 00:40:30 +0200
> Well if you're going to make comments like that, you
> have to explain RFC 3497.
we'll let those who passed it explain themselves. i have forwarded
your mail.
> How can the IESG approve 1.485 Gbps over RTP/UDP, and then state
> that IPFIX has to use TCP?
i am not aware of stating that ipfix had to use tcp. but it will
have to supply a mandatory to implement congestion friendly
transport.
randy