[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-ipsec-dpd - A Traffic-Based Method of Detecting Dead IKE Peers
- To: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
- Subject: Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-ipsec-dpd - A Traffic-Based Method of Detecting Dead IKE Peers
- From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:12:33 -0400
- Cc: Internet Engineering Steering Group <iesg@ietf.org>
In message <E1A4hGp-0005VK-GE@asgard.ietf.org>, IESG Secretary writes:
>--------
>
>Last Call to expire on: 2003-09-28
>
> Please return the full line with your position.
>
> Yes No-Objection Discuss Abstain
>Steve Bellovin [ ] [ X ] [ ] [ ]
This is very close to a DISCUSS...
As I understand the situation, the document describes current practice,
rather than defining new protocol elements. This is not clear in the
text of the document. (It also uses numbers from the private range,
which would be exceedingly bad for a standards-track protocol.) The
fourth paragraph of the Introduction, which begins "To this end",
should start something like this:
To this end, a number of vendors have implemented their own
approach to dead peer detection. This document describes how
they detect peer liveliness without needing ...
The abstract (and perhaps the title) should probably have similar changes.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb