Re: Interim IESG document review

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>]

Alex,

thanks!

I AM worried about workload - we currently have more than a hundred 
documents in some "IESG Review" substate, and my gut feeling is that it's 
growing - having more documents to review risks having less energy to push 
the endgame documents out the door.

Another issue I see is whether a positive interim review where some ADs 
missed reviewing the documents will come back to haunt us at final approval 
time, if we find something.

But if we can get effective review and guidance to the WGs, that could be 
significantly beneficial.

I've added your proposal to the reading materials directory for Chicago.

              Harald