Re: a proposal to be subitted to teh ITU-T TSAG

[Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>]

them are the questions

---
>From gih@telstra.net  Thu Oct 30 17:06:46 2003
X-Sender: gih@kahuna.telstra.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 08:43:55 +1100
To: Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>, leslie@thinkingcat.com, sob@harvard.edu
From: Geoff Huston <gih@telstra.net>
Subject: Re: a proposal to be subitted to teh ITU-T TSAG
Cc: iab@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <200310302122.h9ULMb68013147@newdev.harvard.edu>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20031031080543.020529b0@kahuna.telstra.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

I'm with you a little better as to the general intent, namely to

- avoid 'joint' document production

but the second is still looking to me a bit like a furry hairball So I'm 
trying to understand what it means to have "a way to collaborate when it 
makes senss"

Is where we are heading with this form of collaboration ...

1:   "you do the work and we'll encourage our folk to sign up to your 
working group" (light weight)

or

2: "we'll formally comment on your draft from time to time and we expect 
our comments to be integrated into the document" (mid weight)

or

3: "we must to be consulted before you approve and if we say 'no' then it 
means 'no" (heavy weight)

or

4: dunno yet (indeterminate weight!)

cheers,

      Geoff