[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Last Call: 'Maximum Transmission Unit Signalling Extensions for the Label Distribution Protocol' to Proposed Standard

To: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: 'Maximum Transmission Unit Signalling Extensions for the Label Distribution Protocol' to Proposed Standard
From: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 20:39:53 -0800 (PST)
Cc: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, iesg@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, ben@layer8.net, "'mpls@uu.net'" <mpls@UU.NET>
In-reply-to: <6182056841.20031104133943@psg.com>
References: <068e01c3a1a0$f3f8e440$f9919ed9@Puppy> <20031104120734.X361@kummer.juniper.net> <6182056841.20031104133943@psg.com>

On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Alex Zinin wrote:

>   What about existing implementations?

There are none that I know of.  If there are any, I would urge them to
speak up!

Kireeti.
-------

References:
- Re: Last Call: 'Maximum Transmission Unit Signalling Extensions for the Label Distribution Protocol' to Proposed Standard
  - From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
- Re: Last Call: 'Maximum Transmission Unit Signalling Extensions for the Label Distribution Protocol' to Proposed Standard
  - From: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>
- Re: Last Call: 'Maximum Transmission Unit Signalling Extensions for the Label Distribution Protocol' to Proposed Standard
  - From: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>

Prev by Date: The IESG statement on IDNA, and the IDNA RFC
Next by Date: Re: Application for port-number (system-klensin) (revised) (fwd)
Previous by thread: Re: Last Call: 'Maximum Transmission Unit Signalling Extensions for the Label Distribution Protocol' to Proposed Standard
Next by thread: worm warning?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread