An important thing here is that we have a lot (clearly more than two required by the process) of implementations and the vast majority of them did not acquire the license (can't say all, of course). For us 'did not conclude licensing was required' is the same as 'licensed under reasonable and non-discriminatory terms'. So, it seems to me that we should not request the licensing statements in the report, and "instead apply the normal requirements for the advancement of Internet Standards"
Can I make this part public? The NetBSD folk are trying to decide what to to about VRRP.
This last para?
Note, that folks have to do their own risk assessment on whether they should implement or not and whether to request a license or not. We shouldn't advise them on this, as we may unintentionally mislead them.
Alex