[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Status of RADEXT Issues 115 and 116
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of Nelson, David
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 2:18 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Status of RADEXT Issues 115 and 116
> All the items included in RADEXT Issues 115 and 116 have been
> resolved in the draft-ietf-radext-ieee802-01.txt revision,
> with the exception of:
> The term "terminal" is not defined in the draft. I suspect
> it identifies the network entity which contains the IEEE
> 802.1X Supplicant function, but this should perhaps be
> This issue still exists in the -01 draft, in Section 2.5.
Yes, this is know. On 1/10/06 I wrote in response to your issue:
"[ms] This sentence comes by way of the IPFilterRule description found
in Diameter [RFC3588]. What would you suggest we do for RADIUS? Is
terminal not a globally known term in RADIUS, if not, is there any?
Perhaps can you suggest a definition to add to the terminology section.
I await your response.
to unsubscribe send a message to email@example.com with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.