RE: review of draft-ietf-radext-ieee802-01.txt

["Congdon, Paul T (ProCurve)" <paul.congdon@hp.com>]

> Technically, we have two alternatives to get there. The first 
> alternative is to make NAS-Filter-Rule(R) an extension of 
> NAS-Filter-Rule(D). Given the same the same attribute name we 
> appear to intend to do this already... The other approach 
> would be to define NAS-Filter-Rule-Radius as a new Radius 
> attribute and then allow its use in Diameter as well.
> 

At IETF-64, I believe we agreed to do the latter.  I think this draft
was supposed to rename the attribute to make that clear.  Looks like we
forgot to do that.

Paul

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>