[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RADEXT Agenda for IETF65, Take Two
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 12:13:01PM -0500, Nelson, David wrote:
> D.3.2 Design Guidelines: 30 minutes to discuss the open issues,
> including any "capabilities" discussion. It this document ready for
> formal acceptance as a WG work item?
Are you referring to the document as the split proposed by the chairs,
or the unsplit document? I think the split is a very good idea; I would
not consider the draft ready as as WG work item it is currently.
However, it seems that Greg hasn't been able to update it in a while.
> D.3.3 Issues & Fixes: 10 minutes discussion. It this document ready
> for formal acceptance as a WG work item?
>
> D.3.4 Prepaid Extensions: 10 minutes for discussion of revised (-10)
> draft.
>
> D.4 Documents requiring cross-WG review (25 minutes):
>
> D.4.1 GEOPRIV-RADIUS: 20 minutes to discuss the status of the solution
> being crafted by Emile & Hannes.
I won't be there in person due to lack of funds, so Hannes will have to
take this up I think.
> D.4.2 RADIUS Prefix Delegation: 5 Minutes to discuss the review was
> posted to the mailing list.
>
> E. Wrap-Up (5 minutes)
Kind regards,
Emile van Bergen.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen emile@e-advies.nl
tel. +31 (0)78 6136282 http://www.e-advies.nl
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>