[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Issue: Attribute concatenation/splitting
I think we should not allow to pack more then one Filter Rule in a
A Filter Rule should be allowed to overflow (span) more then one
If you have more then one filter rules in a packet with some filter
rules overflowing, how can you tell when a new one begins?
A filter rule always starts with an action: permit or deny. These words
do not appear anywhere else in the rule. Therefore a Filter Atribute
that starts with a permit or deny must be a new filter rule.
What is wrong with that?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of Bernard Aboba
> Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 3:05 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: Issue: Attribute concatenation/splitting
> Do we have a conclusion from this thread? If so, can someone
> state what they think it is?
> to unsubscribe send a message to email@example.com with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
to unsubscribe send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.