[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Consensus Call: "Sense of the Room" at RADEXT WG meeting at IETF 66

To: "Congdon, Paul T (ProCurve)" <paul.congdon@hp.com>
Subject: Re: Consensus Call: "Sense of the Room" at RADEXT WG meeting at IETF 66
From: "Alan DeKok" <aland@nitros9.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:58:31 -0400
Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:57:42 PDT." <85ECA15B7BB46944BFD4C73AEA55482405222AF7@cacexc07.americas.cpqcorp.net>

"Congdon, Paul T (ProCurve)" <paul.congdon@hp.com> wrote:
> I support this consensus position.  In particular I support the
> simplified approach proposed by Lior.

  For those of us not in the room, what was that?

  Alan DeKok.



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Consensus Call: "Sense of the Room" at RADEXT WG meeting at IETF 66
  - From: "Congdon, Paul T (ProCurve)" <paul.congdon@hp.com>

References:
- RE: Consensus Call: "Sense of the Room" at RADEXT WG meeting at IETF 66
  - From: "Congdon, Paul T (ProCurve)" <paul.congdon@hp.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Consensus Call: "Sense of the Room" at RADEXT WG meeting at IETF 66
Next by Date: AW: Consensus Call: "Sense of the Room" at RADEXT WG meeting at IETF 66
Previous by thread: RE: Consensus Call: "Sense of the Room" at RADEXT WG meeting at IETF 66
Next by thread: RE: Consensus Call: "Sense of the Room" at RADEXT WG meeting at IETF 66
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread