[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
re:Re: [RRG] RRG process clarification
> What I gathered from the above:
> - a clearly defined set of terminology is critically important
> (I saw fair number of "ID"s in a pretty short paragraph:-)
> - the terminology definition, in turn, critically depend on reaching
> agreement on a set of basic concepts.
> (e.g. is a wireline connectivity a special case of generally
> - what falls into the basic concepts depends on the scope of the
> design (e.g. the overall Internet architecture, vs. the routing
> architecture with a clear understanding of its relations to the
> other parts)
agree, the first thing we need to do is to define the concept clearly before architecture design,and I believe that the scope of design is the first concept to be defined since it will determine what's the best candidate of id and locator.
to unsubscribe send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg