Mail Index

• Thread Index

• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• [RRG] Multiple PA blocks
  • From: Olivier Bonaventure <Olivier.Bonaventure@uclouvain.be>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
• [RRG] "No renumbering" for any networks precludes scalable support for packets from non-upgraded networks
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• [RRG] Consensus reached: renumbering
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
• [RRG] Splitting the problem
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Heinrich Hummel" <heinerhummel@kabelmail.de>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• Re: Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Heinrich Hummel" <heinerhummel@kabelmail.de>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: David Williamson <dlw+rrg@tellme.com>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
• Re: Re: [RRG] Stretch in case of LISP+ALT
  • From: "heinerhummel@kabelmail.de" <heinerhummel@kabelmail.de>
• Re: [RRG] Stretch in case of LISP+ALT
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] Stretch in case of LISP+ALT
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• [RRG] Stretch in case of LISP+ALT
  • From: "Heinrich Hummel" <heinerhummel@kabelmail.de>
• Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - all networks need not be treated the same
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] PI as a non-requirement
  • From: Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
• Re: Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Heinrich Hummel" <heinerhummel@kabelmail.de>
• [RRG] Administrivia: mailing list management
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org>
• Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering
  • From: "Heinrich Hummel" <heinerhummel@kabelmail.de>
• Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  • From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
• Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  • From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
• Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  • From: Bruce Curtis <bruce.curtis@ndsu.edu>
• Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  • From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
• Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - question lacks detail
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  • From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  • From: "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  • From: "Dale W. Carder" <dwcarder@wisc.edu>
• Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  • From: "Dale W. Carder" <dwcarder@wisc.edu>
• RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  • From: "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• [RRG] Renumbering once might be OK when converting to Scalable PI (SPI space)
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• [RRG] Portability between mapping providers
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• [RRG] Paper: TTR Mobility Extensions for Core-Edge Separation Solutions
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering
  • From: Olivier Bonaventure <Olivier.Bonaventure@uclouvain.be>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
• RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering
  • From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
• RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - 3 kinds of thing which might be renumbered
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - 3 kinds of thing which might be renumbered
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• [RRG] Alternative to encapsulation: IPv4 ETR Address Forwarding (EAF)
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering
  • From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
• [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
• [RRG] RE: ALT oeprational model
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• [RRG] Re: ALT oeprational model
  • From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering... mapping
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Peter Sherbin <pesherb@yahoo.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Peter Sherbin <pesherb@yahoo.com>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Peter Sherbin <pesherb@yahoo.com>
• Huh? Was: Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• RE: [RRG] Will the flat ID and its corresponding resolution infrastracture be practicable? [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Rolf Winter" <Rolf.Winter@nw.neclab.eu>
• re: [RRG] Will the flat ID and its corresponding resolution infrastracture be practicable? [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• [RRG] Re: Abstracted Networking APIs
  • From: RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Peter Sherbin <pesherb@yahoo.com>
• Re: [RRG] Providers and providers
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] Will the flat ID and its corresponding resolution infrastracture be practicable? [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Heinrich Hummel" <heinerhummel@kabelmail.de>
• Re: [RRG] On identifiers, was: Re: Does every host need a FQDN
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Peter Sherbin <pesherb@yahoo.com>
• Re: [RRG] Providers and providers
  • From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
• [RRG] Re: Providers and Providers
  • From: RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Providers and providers
  • From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Peter Sherbin <pesherb@yahoo.com>
• Re: [RRG] Providers and providers
  • From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• Re: [RRG] Will the flat ID and its corresponding resolution infrastracture be practicable? [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• Re: [RRG] Providers and providers
  • From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
• Re: [RRG] Re: PI as a non-requirement
  • From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] Providers and providers
  • From: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
• Re: [RRG] Providers and providers
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• Re: [RRG] Providers and providers
  • From: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
• Re: [RRG] Providers and providers
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Providers and providers
  • From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] Providers and providers
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Providers and providers
  • From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] Providers and providers
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• [RRG] Re: PI as a non-requirement
  • From: RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>
• Re: [RRG] PI as a non-requirement
  • From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering... ACLs etc.
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• [RRG] PI as a non-requirement
  • From: RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>
• [RRG] Providers and providers
  • From: RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Heinrich Hummel" <heinerhummel@kabelmail.de>
• [RRG] Will the flat ID and its corresponding resolution infrastracture be practicable? [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Fleischman, Eric" <eric.fleischman@boeing.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Fleischman, Eric" <eric.fleischman@boeing.com>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
• Re: RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Heinrich Hummel" <heinerhummel@kabelmail.de>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Fleischman, Eric" <eric.fleischman@boeing.com>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• re: [RRG] Renumbering... ACLs etc.
  • From: Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Fleischman, Eric" <eric.fleischman@boeing.com>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Scott Weeks" <Scott.Weeks@hawaiiantel.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering... ACLs etc.
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Fleischman, Eric" <eric.fleischman@boeing.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering... ACLs etc.
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Fleischman, Eric" <eric.fleischman@boeing.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Fleischman, Eric" <eric.fleischman@boeing.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering... ACLs etc.
  • From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering... ACLs etc.
  • From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering... ACLs etc.
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering... ACLs etc.
  • From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering... ACL alternatives?
  • From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering... ACLs etc.
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering... ACLs etc.
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] Re: Six/One Router: why have bilateral mode? Referrals . . .
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] Moving towards a new set of Networking APIs
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering... ACLs etc.
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• [RRG] Re: Six/One Router: why have bilateral mode? Referrals . . .
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• [RRG] Six/One Router: why have bilateral mode? Referrals . . .
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering... ACLs etc.
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] On identifiers, was: Re: Does every host need a FQDN
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] Moving towards a new set of Networking APIs
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] On identifiers, was: Re: Does every host need a FQDN
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] On identifiers, was: Re: Does every host need a FQDN
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] A Late Response to Questions on Six/One Router
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] A Late Response to Questions on Six/One Router
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Michael Menth <menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Fleischman, Eric" <eric.fleischman@boeing.com>
• Re: [RRG] On identifiers, was: Re: Does every host need a FQDN
  • From: Brian Carpenter <brian@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
• [RRG] Moving towards a new set of Networking APIs
  • From: RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• Re: [RRG] On identifiers, was: Re: Does every host need a FQDN
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: RE: [RRG] On identifiers, was: Re: Does every host need a FQDN
  • From: "Heinrich Hummel" <heinerhummel@kabelmail.de>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Heinrich Hummel" <heinerhummel@kabelmail.de>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Stig Venaas <stig.venaas@uninett.no>
• RE: [RRG] On identifiers, was: Re: Does every host need a FQDN
  • From: "Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannu.flinck@nsn.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• Popping up a level (was Re: [RRG] On identifiers, was: Re: Does every host need a FQDN)
  • From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] On identifiers, was: Re: Does every host need a FQDN
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• [RRG] Renumbering...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] On identifiers, was: Re: Does every host need a FQDN
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] On identifiers, was: Re: Does every host need a FQDN
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• RE: [RRG] Perplexing PMTUD and packet length observations Oops: TSO
  • From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
• [RRG] On identifiers, was: Re: Does every host need a FQDN
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Perplexing PMTUD and packet length observations Oops: TSO
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RR=
  • From: "Heinrich Hummel" <heinerhummel@kabelmail.de>
• Re: [RRG] Logistics preferences...
  • From: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
• Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• Re: [RRG] Perplexing PMTUD and packet length observations
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Perplexing PMTUD and packet length observations
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• RE: [RRG] Perplexing PMTUD and packet length observations
  • From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
• Re: [RRG] Perplexing PMTUD and packet length observations
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Perplexing PMTUD and packet length observations
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] Perplexing PMTUD and packet length observations
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Logistics preferences...
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• RE: [RRG] Logistics preferences...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] Perplexing PMTUD and packet length observations
  • From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
• Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] Perplexing PMTUD and packet length observations
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Logistics preferences...
  • From: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
• Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• [RRG] Perplexing PMTUD and packet length observations
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• RE: [RRG] Re: Six/One Router revised 2008-07-12 - IPsec
  • From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
• Re: [RRG] GLI-Split
  • From: Michael Menth <menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
• Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Steven Blake <slblake@petri-meat.com>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router revised 2008-07-12 - IPsec
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] Re: Six/One Router revised 2008-07-12 - IPsec
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router revised 2008-07-12 - IPsec
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] Logistics preferences...
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] Re: Six/One Router revised 2008-07-12 - IPsec
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] Re: Six/One Router revised 2008-07-12 - IPsec
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• RE: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router revised 2008-07-12 - IPsec
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Re: Six/One Router revised 2008-07-12 - IPsec
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• [RRG] Logistics
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] Logistics preferences...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] A Late Response to Questions on Six/One Router
  • From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 1: the space
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• Re: [RRG] A Late Response to Questions on Six/One Router
  • From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 1: the space
  • From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
• Re: [RRG] Logistics preferences...
  • From: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
• Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 1: the space
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• Re: [RRG] Logistics preferences...
  • From: Steven Blake <slblake@petri-meat.com>
• RE: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Steven Blake <slblake@petri-meat.com>
• Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Steven Blake <slblake@petri-meat.com>
• RE: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Sheng Jiang <shengjiang@huawei.com>
• Re: [RRG] Logistics preferences...
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>
• Re: [RRG] Logistics preferences...
  • From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>
• Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>
• RE: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>
• re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>
• Re: [RRG] Logistics preferences...
  • From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
• Re: [RRG] Logistics preferences...
  • From: Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
• Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• RE: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• RE: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
• Re: [RRG] Ivip6 - Forwarding Label in the Core
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Steven Blake <slblake@petri-meat.com>
• Re: [RRG] Logistics preferences...
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] Logistics preferences...
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] Logistics preferences...
  • From: Luigi Iannone <luigi.iannone@uclouvain.be>
• Re: [RRG] Logistics preferences...
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• RE: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>
• RE: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>
• re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>
• [RRG] RE: Logistics preferences...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Logistics preferences...
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• RE: [RRG] Logistics preferences...
  • From: "PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri" <Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel-lucent.be>
• Re: [RRG] Logistics preferences...
  • From: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
• Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] Logistics preferences...
  • From: Brian Dickson <briand@ca.afilias.info>
• [RRG] Logistics preferences...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
• [RRG] Ivip6 - Forwarding Label in the Core
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• [RRG] A new brand of MPLS can do the job
  • From: "Heinrich Hummel" <heinerhummel@kabelmail.de>
• re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>
• Re: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] NAT-PT and other approaches to IPv6 adoption - Dual Stack Lite
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] Re: Ivip6: number of "Flow Label" bits required
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] NAT-PT and other approaches to IPv6 adoption - Dual Stack Lite
  • From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
• Re: [RRG] NAT-PT and other approaches to IPv6 adoption - Dual Stack Lite: P2P usage rates
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] NAT-PT and other approaches to IPv6 adoption - Dual Stack Lite
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] Short explanation: Ivip6's "Core Routing Label Forwarding"
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] NAT-PT and other approaches to IPv6 adoption - Dual Stack Lite
  • From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
• [RRG] Short explanation: Ivip6's "Core Routing Label Forwarding"
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] FLOWv6: IPv6 Flow Label to control DFZ forwarding
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] FLOWv6: IPv6 Flow Label to control DFZ forwarding
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] FLOWv6: IPv6 Flow Label to control DFZ forwarding
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• RE: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
• RE: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
• Re: [RRG] Re: Ivip6: number of "Flow Label" bits required
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• [RRG] Re: Ivip6: number of "Flow Label" bits required
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• [RRG] Ivip6: number of "Flow Label" bits required
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• [RRG] Ivip6 (previously FLOWv6), Ivip4 and Ivip
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• RE: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• RE: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Brian Dickson <briand@ca.afilias.info>
• Re: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 1: the space
  • From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 1: the space
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] NAT-PT and other approaches to IPv6 adoption - Dual Stack Lite
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: RFC3697 [Re: [RRG] FLOWv6: IPv6 Flow Label to control DFZ forwarding]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• Re: [RRG] NAT-PT and other approaches to IPv6 adoption - Dual Stack Lite
  • From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
• RE: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: xuxiaohu 41208 <xuxh@huawei.com>
• RE: RFC3697 [Re: [RRG] FLOWv6: IPv6 Flow Label to control DFZ forwarding]
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] position paper on resource pooling
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• [RRG] Re: position paper on resource pooling
  • From: "Mark Handley" <M.Handley@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
• [RRG] position paper on resource pooling
  • From: Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr>
• Re: [RRG] NAT-PT and other approaches to IPv6 adoption - Dual Stack Lite
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• [RRG] paper on separation of locators and identifiers
  • From: Aaron Falk <falk@bbn.com>
• Re: RFC3697 [Re: [RRG] FLOWv6: IPv6 Flow Label to control DFZ forwarding]
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• RFC3697 [Re: [RRG] FLOWv6: IPv6 Flow Label to control DFZ forwarding]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 1: the space
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• [RRG]
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 1: the space
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• [RRG] FLOWv6: IPv6 Flow Label to control DFZ forwarding
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• [RRG] Re: Six/One Router revised 2008-07-12
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• [RRG] Six/One Router revised 2008-07-12
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] Opportunistic Topological Aggregation in the RIB->FIB Calculation?
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Re: Difference between translation in LISP vs. Six/One Router -- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• [RRG] Agenda changes...
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Re: Difference between translation in LISP vs. Six/One Router -- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 3: caching: FIBs, local query servers
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 1: the space
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• [RRG] Re: Difference between translation in LISP vs. Six/One Router -- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: David Meyer <dmm@1-4-5.net>
• Re: Difference between translation in LISP vs. Six/One Router -- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• [RRG] Re: Difference between translation in LISP vs. Six/One Router -- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: David Meyer <dmm@1-4-5.net>
• Difference between translation in LISP vs. Six/One Router -- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] LISP home page www.lisp4.net
  • From: David Meyer <dmm@1-4-5.net>
• [RRG] LISP home page www.lisp4.net
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• [RRG] Business incentives for LISP PTRs and Ivip OITRDs
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 3: caching
  • From: Luigi Iannone <luigi.iannone@uclouvain.be>
• RE: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Map-encap, fragmentation, PMTUD etc.
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• RE: [RRG] Map-encap, fragmentation, PMTUD etc.
  • From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
• [RRG] Map-encap, fragmentation, PMTUD etc.
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• RE: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
• RE: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 3: caching
  • From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
• Re: [RRG] Current drafts
  • From: Luigi Iannone <Luigi.Iannone@uclouvain.be>
• Re: [RRG] Current drafts
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] Current drafts
  • From: Luigi Iannone <luigi.iannone@uclouvain.be>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate
  • From: Luigi Iannone <luigi.iannone@uclouvain.be>
• RE: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 1: the space
  • From: "Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannu.flinck@nsn.com>
• Re: [RRG] Mapping Distribution and Management: contribution for comments
  • From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
• RE: vulnerability of being attacked//RE: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• vulnerability of being attacked//RE: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator
  • From: xuxiaohu 41208 <xuxh@huawei.com>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate
  • From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 2: upper layer implications
  • From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
• Re: [RRG] Mapping Distribution and Management: contribution for comments
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] a few draft towards convergence
  • From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>
• Re: [RRG] Mapping Distribution and Management: contribution for comments
  • From: ksriram@nist.gov
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• [RRG] GLI-Split
  • From: Michael Menth <menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
• Re: [RRG] Mapping Distribution and Management: contribution for comments
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] Current drafts
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] a few draft towards convergence
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• RE: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• RE: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 3: caching
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 3: caching
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 3: caching
  • From: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
• RE: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 2: upper layer implications
  • From: "PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri" <Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel-lucent.be>
• RE: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 3: caching
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 3: caching
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate
  • From: Olivier Bonaventure <Olivier.Bonaventure@uclouvain.be>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 2: upper layer implications
  • From: Olivier Bonaventure <Olivier.Bonaventure@uclouvain.be>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 3: caching
  • From: Olivier Bonaventure <Olivier.Bonaventure@uclouvain.be>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 3: caching
  • From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 3: caching
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• RE: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
• [RRG] Design Taxonomy/Analysis for Address-Indirection-Based Solutions
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] a new (not few) draft towards convergence
  • From: Dan Jen <jenster@cs.ucla.edu>
• RE: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] a new (not few) draft towards convergence
  • From: Luigi Iannone <Luigi.Iannone@uclouvain.be>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 3: caching
  • From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 3: caching
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• RE: [RRG] Opportunistic Topological Aggregation in the RIB->FIB Calculation?
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 3: caching
  • From: Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>
• re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 3: caching
  • From: Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>
• Re: [RRG] Opportunistic Topological Aggregation in the RIB->FIB Calculation?
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• re: [RRG] RE: Is the flat identifier acceptable
  • From: Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>
• Re: [RRG] a new (not few) draft towards convergence
  • From: Dan Jen <jenster@cs.ucla.edu>
• RE: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• [RRG] Re: Is the flat identifier acceptable
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] RE: Is the flat identifier acceptable
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 3: caching
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 3: caching
  • From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
• Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 3: caching
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate
  • From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
• [RRG] thoughts on the design space 3: caching
  • From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
• [RRG] thoughts on the design space 2: upper layer implications
  • From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
• [RRG] thoughts on the design space 1: the space
  • From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
• Re: [RRG] RE: Is the flat identifier acceptable
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• Re: [RRG] IEEE EUI-64 as an Identifier format
  • From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] a new (not few) draft towards convergence
  • From: Luigi Iannone <luigi.iannone@uclouvain.be>
• Re: [RRG] RE: Is the flat identifier acceptable
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• RE: [RRG] RE: Is the flat identifier acceptable
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• re: [RRG] RE: Is the flat identifier acceptable
  • From: Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>
• [RRG] RE: Is the flat identifier acceptable
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• [RRG] Is the flat identifier acceptable
  • From: Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Brian Carpenter <brian@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
• RE: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: "Drake, John E" <John.E.Drake2@boeing.com>
• Re: [RRG] Question about Six/One host and router
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] Opportunistic Topological Aggregation in the RIB->FIB Calculation?
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] Opportunistic Topological Aggregation in the RIB->FIB Calculation?
  • From: Brian Dickson <briand@ca.afilias.info>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] IEEE EUI-64 as an Identifier format
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
• Re: [RRG] IEEE EUI-64 as an Identifier format
  • From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
• Re: [RRG] Opportunistic Topological Aggregation in the RIB->FIB Calculation?
  • From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
• Re: [RRG] Opportunistic Topological Aggregation in the RIB->FIB Calculation?
  • From: Peter Sherbin <pesherb@yahoo.com>
• Re: [RRG] GSE?
  • From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
• Re: [RRG] Moving forward...
  • From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
• Re: [RRG] Opportunistic Topological Aggregation in the RIB->FIB Calculation?
  • From: ksriram@nist.gov
• [RRG] Review of ILNP -- plus a new idea
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] Opportunistic Topological Aggregation in the RIB->FIB Calculation?
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Opportunistic Topological Aggregation in the RIB->FIB Calculation?
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• re: [RRG] Opportunistic Topological Aggregation in the RIB->FIB Calculation?
  • From: Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>
• Re: [RRG] Opportunistic Topological Aggregation in the RIB->FIB Calculation?
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• Re: [RRG] Opportunistic Topological Aggregation in the RIB->FIB Calculation?
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• Re: [RRG] RE: Abstraction action boundary & geo-aggregation router behavior
  • From: Peter Sherbin <pesherb@yahoo.com>
• Re: [RRG] Opportunistic Topological Aggregation in the RIB->FIB Calculation?
  • From: "K. Sriram" <ksriram@nist.gov>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
• RE: [RRG] Opportunistic Topological Aggregation in the RIB->FIB Calculation?
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Opportunistic Topological Aggregation in the RIB->FIB Calculation?
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• [RRG] a new (not few) draft towards convergence
  • From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>
• Re: [RRG] Opportunistic Topological Aggregation in the RIB->FIB Calculation?
  • From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• Re: [RRG] Opportunistic Topological Aggregation in the RIB->FIB Calculation?
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• [RRG] RE: FIB challenges, RIB, BGP, DRAM limitations
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• [RRG] RE: Abstraction action boundary & geo-aggregation router behavior
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• [RRG] FIB challenges, RIB, BGP, DRAM limitations
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer@mauigateway.com>
• [RRG] Abstraction action boundary & geo-aggregation router behavior
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>
• RE: [RRG] Opportunistic Topological Aggregation in the RIB->FIB Calculation?
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• [RRG] Searching the RRG archives at mail-archive.com
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] Opportunistic Topological Aggregation in the RIB->FIB Calculation?
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• RE: [RRG] Opportunistic Topological Aggregation in the RIB->FIB Calculation?
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: Geo RIB-FIB compression, was: Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• [RRG] Opportunistic Topological Aggregation in the RIB->FIB Calculation?
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• [RRG] a few draft towards convergence
  • From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• Geo RIB-FIB compression, was: Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• [RRG] Question about Six/One host and router
  • From: "Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannu.flinck@nsn.com>
• Geo RIB-FIB compression, was: Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: Brian Dickson <briand@ca.afilias.info>
• RE: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: Peter Sherbin <pesherb@yahoo.com>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] RRG scope avoids practical concerns
  • From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
• RE: [RRG] RRG scope avoids practical concerns
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• [RRG] RRG scope avoids practical concerns
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• RE: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: Peter Sherbin <pesherb@yahoo.com>
• RE: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
• RE: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• RE: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: Ricardo Oliveira <rveloso@CS.UCLA.EDU>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• [RRG] Re: Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: Ricardo Oliveira <rveloso@cs.ucla.edu>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality
  • From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
• [RRG] Discussions in Dublin
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] Publicly available LISP and shim6 implementations
  • From: David Meyer <dmm@1-4-5.net>
• [RRG] Mapping Distribution and Management: contribution for comments
  • From: "K. Sriram" <ksriram@nist.gov>
• RE: [RRG] Publicly available LISP and shim6 implementations
  • From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
• Re: [RRG] Publicly available LISP and shim6 implementations
  • From: Luigi Iannone <Luigi.Iannone@uclouvain.be>
• RE: [RRG] Publicly available LISP and shim6 implementations
  • From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
• Re: [RRG] Publicly available LISP and shim6 implementations
  • From: Olivier Bonaventure <Olivier.Bonaventure@uclouvain.be>
• [RRG] Publicly available LISP and shim6 implementations
  • From: Olivier Bonaventure <Olivier.Bonaventure@uclouvain.be>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
• [RRG] Current drafts
  • From: <louise.burness@bt.com>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
• RE: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: "Darrel Lewis (darlewis)" <darlewis@cisco.com>
• RE: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Does LISP 3 use the cache mechanism on ITR for the EID-to-RLOC mapping?
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• RE: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] Does LISP 3 use the cache mechanism on ITR for the EID-to-RLOC mapping?
  • From: "Dongxiao Xu" <njuxdx@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] Does LISP 3 use the cache mechanism on ITR for the EID-to-RLOC mapping?
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• [RRG] Does LISP 3 use the cache mechanism on ITR for the EID-to-RLOC mapping?
  • From: "Dongxiao Xu" <njuxdx@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• Re: [RRG] Abstraction of problem space
  • From: Brian Dickson <briand@ca.afilias.info>
• [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• [RRG] A Late Response to Questions on Six/One Router
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] Abstraction of problem space
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• RE: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG?
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG?
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• RE: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG?
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
• Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG?
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• RE: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG?
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• Re: [RRG] Abstraction of problem space
  • From: Brian Dickson <briand@ca.afilias.info>
• Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
• [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG?
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG?
  • From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
• Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG?
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG?
  • From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
• Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG?
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• Re: [RRG] Abstraction of problem space
  • From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
• RE: [RRG] Abstraction of problem space
  • From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
• [RRG] Abstraction of problem space
  • From: Brian Dickson <briand@ca.afilias.info>
• Re: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator
  • From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>
• Re: [RRG] Terminology
  • From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
• Re: [RRG] Should the identifier be used as local locator
  • From: Christian Vogt