[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
If PI is available, then all users will tend to cling to it,
other possible solution. Our entire job is to give them an
No not true. Since PI addressing is so popular and saves so much in
opex, we should come up with a solution that allows or embraces it.
Let them cling to it, they have stated the desire to use them, let's
just keep them out of core routing. You can't beat their arguments.
We have said this many times before in LISP fora, PI addresses used at
sites are the EID-prefixes that map to topologically aggregatable
This is what we are doing in the LISP testbed by using IPv4 EID-
prefixes from PI block 188.8.131.52/16 and IPv6 EID-prefixes from PI
IMO, this is a solved problem. All we need is a lot more testing and
some deployment experience.
to unsubscribe send a message to email@example.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg