[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [RRG] Moving forward... IPv4 now, IPv6 less urgent and perhaps more ambitious
|I wonder whether the RRG is to design a new architecture or
|just to fix the
|scalability issue of IPv6. And I think it will determine how
|much change we
|can make in the Internet architecture.
|In other word, should HIP like approach be taken into RRG's
|provided that there was no separate working group and research group in
We have a great deal of freedom to propose anything that results in a better
routing architecture. Obviously, it should be clearly motivated and a
rational extrapolation from the solution that we set forth.
Could we specifically recommend HIP? Certainly, however working on it here
would seem somewhat redundant.
to unsubscribe send a message to email@example.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg