[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RRG] Moving forward...
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:30 PM, David Conrad <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2008, at 10:48 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>> 1. The IPv6 variant (which may be but probably isn't compatible with IPv4)
>> 2. The IPv4 variant (which is compatible with but likely suboptimal for
>> 3. The clean-slate variant which we could design if we weren't
>> constrained by IPv4 or IPv6.
> In a world of limited resources, which should be the priority?
The one that demonstrably impacts the largest installed customer base,
But that's a false question. The limited resource is not manhours but
rather the creative input of the group's participants. Like with the
Manhattan Project, that creative input usually benefits from pursuing
multiple solution paths to completion.
William D. Herrin ................ email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
to unsubscribe send a message to email@example.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg