[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG?
Yes !!! Be assured, myself, I am also and only focused on a long-
term solution, i.e. on a forever scaling solution.
At the same time I never was opposed to LISP or whichever map-encap
variant if considered to be a near-term interim solution.By other
words: map-encap is definitely not the longterm solution.
Instead I am convinced that topology aggregation will become the
longterm solution because it would scale even if the internet became
bigger than the network of our roads and streets.
And to add to this, from the beginning, none of the LISP authors felt
that LISP was the ultimate long-term solution.
So, should the short-term map-n-encap solution be for IPv4 and the
long-term solution be for IPv6 only? That would depart from the
thought of having one solution for both address-families.
Could we agree that one map-n-encap solution for both IPv4 and IPv6 be
a short-term solution while we work on a long-term solution for IPv6-
to unsubscribe send a message to email@example.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg