Re: Last Call on RSVP Label Allocation for Backup Tunnels

[Bora Akyol <akyol@pluris.com>]

George

The point that I was trying to make is that there is **other** reroute 
work going on within the CCAMP WG and I am not sure about the 
interaction between that work and the draft that is in question. Hence I 
asked **a** question below.

If it turns out that the WG consensus is to do a last call and send the 
draft forward, fine by me. However, the draft may get obsoleted quickly 
once the CCAMP WG concludes the fast reroute work.

Bora

On Friday, March 30, 2001, at 01:04 PM, George Swallow wrote:

>> As far as I understand this draft outlines a mechanism for fast reroute
>> in MPLS networks. With this in mind, shouldn't we delay the last call 
>> on
>> this draft until ther **other** fast reroute related drafts in CCAMP 
>> run
>> to completion?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Bora
>
> Bora -
>
> I don't get your point.  Would you suggest that Sonet not specify BLSR
> or closer to home IPoPTR not work on rerouting schemes?  This is a
> technology specific mechanism which has immediate application.  How or
> even if it fits into a larger picture is irrelavant.
>
> ...George
>
>
> ==================================================================
> George Swallow       Cisco Systems                   (978) 244-8143
>                      250 Apollo Drive
>                      Chelmsford, Ma 01824
>