RE: Proposed Addition to CCAMP Charter

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

Inline

> ----------
> From: 	Martin Dubuc[SMTP:martin.dubuc@edgeflow.com]
> Sent: 	Tuesday, June 05, 2001 6:45 PM
> To: 	'Wijnen, Bert (Bert)'; ccamp-wg; Thomas D. Nadeau
> Cc: 	Scott Bradner; Sudheer Dharanikota (E-mail); Jonathan Lang (E-mail);
> Evan McGinnis (E-mail)
> Subject: 	RE: Proposed Addition to CCAMP Charter
> 
> Bert,
> 
> Can you tell us when you expect to complete evaluation of all I-D
> summaries?
> Is it a matter of days, weeks, months?
> 
> Who decides whether LMP should be a CCAMP WG charter item? I am quite a
> bit
> surprised that someone is considering putting G-MPLS and LMP in different
> WGs. Is there a rationale for this?
Nope no plans for that... but I believe I did see in some WG minutes that
your WG chairs were considering to merge the LMP and NTIP proposals.
I think it mentioned that requirements would be written down first... and
then one would see what the next steps would be... I would need to dig in
to archives to find what the exact statement was.

In any event, we wanted all I-Ds, also those that were already WG I-Ds
to send in a summary. The WG chairs are the first to assess that input.
as soon as we hear from them, we'll know more.

Bert

> Regards,
> 
> Martin
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 11:58 AM
> To: ccamp-wg; Thomas D. Nadeau
> Cc: Scott Bradner; Sudheer Dharanikota (E-mail); Jonathan Lang (E-mail);
> Evan McGinnis (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: Proposed Addition to CCAMP Charter
> Importance: High
> 
> 
> Your WG chairs with the ADs and TAs are evaluating all the I-D summaries
> that have been submitted with CCAMP as the target WG.
> Once we have gone through those, we will also address the work item
> of an LMP MIB (that is if LMP is still also a WG charter item by then).
> 
> Bert
> 
> > ----------
> > From: 	Thomas D. Nadeau[SMTP:tnadeau@cisco.com]
> > Sent: 	Tuesday, June 05, 2001 5:08 PM
> > To: 	ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> > Cc: 	bwijnen@lucent.com; Scott Bradner; Sudheer Dharanikota
> (E-mail);
> > Jonathan Lang (E-mail); Evan McGinnis (E-mail)
> > Subject: 	Proposed Addition to CCAMP Charter
> > 
> > 
> > 	Hello,
> > 
> > 	It has been brought to my attention recently
> > that despite the WG voting to adopt the LMP-MIB
> > during the Minneapolis meeting, that the adoption of
> > this document is not possible because there is no mention
> > of network management in the CCAMP WG charter. Therefore
> > I propose that since the features we are working
> > on in the WG are not very useful unless they are
> > manageable, that where appropriate,
> > marriageability (or at least SNMP MIBs) of things
> > developed in CCAMP be added to the charter.
> > 
> > 	--Tom
> > 
> > 
>