Re: Proposed Addition to CCAMP Charter

[Andre Fredette <fredette@photonex.com>]

I second George's statement.

Also, as Osama mentioned in a previous note, I will be submitting an I-D on 
requirements for an interface to WDM transmission systems in the next 
couple of days.

This I-D was co-authored by the LMP-WDM and NTIP co-authors, together with 
a few other individuals who expressed an interest during the last meeting.

Andre

At 03:19 PM 6/5/2001 -0400, George Swallow wrote:
>Martin  -
>
> > Looking back at the minutes, there seems to have been quite a debate during
> > the CCAMP session between LMP and NTIP proponents. I do not know how we 
> move
> > forward though. The debate has not been happening on the mailing list. Even
> > though Andre has asked a question to NTIP authors to stir the debate to the
> > mailing, no response has come back. Otherwise, I have only seen some
> > discussions on LMP-WDM vs. funiculus.
>
>Don't confuse LMP with LMP-WDM.  There is no major controversy over
>LMP.  The debate was how to add some functionality to extract
>information from WDMs.  One proposal, LMP-WDM, extends LMP to do
>this.  NTIP proposes a new protocol.  Just because there is a debate
>over where this new functionality goes, we shouldn't let that affect
>the progress of LMP.
>
>...George
>
>
>==================================================================
>George Swallow       Cisco Systems                   (978) 244-8143
>                      250 Apollo Drive
>                      Chelmsford, Ma 01824