Re: OLI requirements

[Loa Andersson <loa.andersson@utfors.se>]

Kireeti and Vijay,

in the capacity of a non-co-author :-)  and operator, please see 
comments inline.


Kireeti Kompella wrote:
> 
> A document on Optical Link Interface Requirements has been submitted
> (URL: http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-many-oli-reqts-00.txt )
> 
> Please review the draft and comment (to _this_ list) on the following:
> 1) Are the requirements stated useful?

yes

> 2) Are there useful requirements that are missing?

nothing that meets the eye or would stop progressing the document

> 3) Do you think that this document should be a CCAMP WG document?
>    a) as it stands today?
>    b) only if it changed?
>    c) no, no matter what surgery is done on it?
>    d) yawn ...

a


> 
> Extra points for terse, technical and temperate comments.
> 
> We'd like to judge the sentiment towards this draft in a week or two,
> so if you'd like your comments to be acted upon, send them soon.

Good, I think this is a typical case there it is extremely more useful 
to have  something (and possible improve later if necessary) than not 
have anything. Please progress this a fast as possible.

/Loa
> 
> Thanks,
> Kireeti & Vijay.

-- 
Loa Andersson
Chief Architect,
Utfors Research, Architecture and Future Lab (URAX)
Utfors AB
Råsundavägen 12
Box 525, 169 29 Solna
Office          +46 8 5270 2000
Office direct   +46 8 5270 5038
Mobile          +46 70 848 5038
Email           loa.andersson@utfors.se
WWW             www.utfors.se