RE: {SUKLM} numbering scheme

["Mannie, Eric" <Eric.Mannie@ebone.com>]

Hello Manoj,

The label is the same of course.

The difference between SDH ITU-T G.707 1996 and SDH ITU-T G.707 2000 is a
small bug coming from an old version. That should be removed by Lou. We
should have only one SDH LSP encoding type value for SDH (same for SONET).

Lou: thanks to correct it.

For the conversion table, Maarten should still have it.

Kind regards,

Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: manoj juneja [mailto:manojkumarjuneja@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 8:28 PM
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: {SUKLM} numbering scheme


Hi All,
          I have a doubt regarding {SUKLM} numbering scheme. If I
allocate one VC-4 signal from STM-64 link, will the {SUKLM} returned be
different if LSP encoding type indicates SDH ITU-T G.707 1996 or SDH
ITU-T G.707 2000 ?

Eric, on the ipo u and marteen once exchanged the conversion table for
EDCBA and SU, If that table is correct, can u please tell me the
formula from which u derived that table ?

Regards,
manoj.


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com